CLever
CLEV
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
CLever (CLEV) demonstrates critical weaknesses across all evaluated dimensions. Active development has ground to a halt with no verifiable repository updates or releases, and community governance is dormant with zero active proposals or participation on its Snapshot space. Tokenomics and market metrics indicate a micro-cap asset ($180K-$300K) experiencing severe illiquidity, near-zero trading volume, and $0 in locked vault value, alongside notable supply centralization and conflicting total supply figures. Security analysis highlights unrenounced contract ownership and an extreme major holder concentration of 98.31%, with no verified third-party smart contract audit report available, though no active exploits or legal actions were identified. A data gap was noted in Team and Governance (scored -1.0) due to search cross-contamination with unrelated entities, and its weight was proportionally redistributed across the remaining categories.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About CLever (CLEV)
CLever (CLEV) is the native utility token of the CLever protocol, developed by AladdinDAO on the Ethereum blockchain. The protocol is structured around a vote-escrow tokenomics model (veCLEV), designed for governance participation and fee capture within its vault system.
The circulating supply represents the large majority of the token's total supply, with emissions nearing exhaustion and a final token unlock scheduled for October 11, 2026. However, total supply metrics vary across reporting sources, indicating either 1.23 million or 2.0 million tokens. The project currently exhibits minimal market adoption and liquidity, characterized by micro-cap valuation, low daily trading volumes, and $0 in total locked value across its vaults. Community governance has become dormant, showing no active Snapshot proposals or recent voter participation, alongside an absence of verified ongoing development updates.
Security evaluations indicate that the protocol does not have a verified formal smart contract audit from a recognized security firm. Automated contract assessments have identified centralization risks, including unrenounced contract owner privileges and an extreme major-holder concentration where a small set of addresses controls over 98% of the non-exchange token supply. No confirmed exploits, hacks, or regulatory enforcement actions are documented in the available records.