BYUSD
BYUSD
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
BYUSD suffers from an extreme lack of public documentation and verifiable data across nearly all evaluation categories. Five of the six evaluation sections (Active Development, Community Support, Market and Use Case, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History) scored -1.0 due to insufficient data, as retrieved sources provided zero token-specific information regarding the issuer, codebase, audit reports, or community presence. In the only scorable category, Tokenomics (3.5/10), BYUSD is identified as a micro-cap ($172,378) USD-pegged stablecoin on Berachain. While it appears to hold its peg, there is total opacity regarding collateral composition, reserve attestations, mint/redeem mechanisms, and supply governance. The overall score reflects the sole scorable metric of 3.5, driven by high structural risk and pervasive obscurity.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About BYUSD (BYUSD)
BYUSD (BYUSD) is a USD-pegged stablecoin deployed on the Berachain network. Designed to trade near parity with the United States dollar, the token operates as a micro-cap asset within the Berachain ecosystem.
The project exhibits a high degree of opacity regarding its underlying mechanics. Available tokenomics data indicates a market capitalization of approximately $172,378 with the price trading near $1.00. However, there is no publicly accessible documentation detailing the token's collateral composition, minting and redemption mechanisms, reserve attestations, or supply governance policies.
Significant risks surround the asset due to a lack of verifiable operational information. Five out of six key evaluation categories—including active development, community presence, market adoption, team governance, and security audits—suffer from insufficient data. There are no verified third-party audit reports or identifiable issuer entities associated with the contract address, leaving the protocol's structural security and solvency unconfirmed.