azit
AZIT
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
The assessment of AZIT is heavily constrained by significant data gaps, as four out of six evaluation sections (Community Support, Tokenomics, Team and Governance, and Security and Audit History) lacked sufficient token-specific data and received -1.0 scores. Based on the available data, the project demonstrates minimal active development (1.5/10), with no verifiable code commits, upgrades, or active open-source contributions. Its Market and Use Case profile (3.5/10) reflects micro-cap status on Klaytn with modest 24-hour volume (~$760K) and unverified merchant adoption or loyalty integration traction. The overall score is calculated from the two available sections by redistributing weights proportionally ((1.5 * 0.20 + 3.5 * 0.15) / 0.35 ≈ 2.36). No qualifying red-flag events or confirmed fraud were established, but the lack of transparent information and stalled development warrant extreme caution.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About azit (AZIT)
AZIT (azit) is a cryptocurrency project operating on the Klaytn (Kaia) blockchain. It is identified as a point-integration and loyalty platform intended for real estate and home-and-living services. The token operates via a smart contract deployed on the Klaytn network (0x6cef6dd9a3c4ad226b8b66effeea2c125df194f1).
Market data indicates that AZIT maintains a micro-cap profile with modest daily trading volume. While the project is listed on tracking platforms such as DappRadar, development evaluations indicate a stalled development posture. There is an absence of verifiable code commits, mainnet upgrades, active open-source repository contributions, or governance proposals.
The project is characterized by substantial data and transparency gaps. Publicly verifiable information regarding AZIT's core founding team, formal governance mechanisms, and detailed tokenomic supply schedules is absent. Furthermore, there is no public record of independent smart contract security audits, nor is there verifiable documentation confirming merchant partnerships, user traction, or commercial adoption of its loyalty integration services.
