Ape and Pepe

The provided section evaluations present a highly contradictory and likely erroneous profile, as the context data explicitly describes two different unrelated projects (THORSwap and ARTDRA Coin) rather than the requested token (APEPE). Analyzing the provided metrics as a composite: the project shows a strong disparity between high scores in Security (9/10) and Team/Governance (6.5/10) versus critical failures in Active Development (0.5/10) and Market Use Case (2.5/10). While the 'Security' section praises a lack of exploits and reputable audits, the 'Tokenomics' and 'Development' sections describe a closed-source project with zero transparency, no visible code repository, and negligible community engagement. The 'Market' section further highlights extremely low trading volume and weak social sentiment. Despite sound theoretical tokenomics (fixed supply), the complete lack of development activity and community support renders the project stagnant. Due to the conflicting data sources and the severity of the red flags in development and market traction, the asset is considered a high-risk venture with little potential for sustainable growth based on this report.