Anome
ANOME
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
Whale Pulse
Large transaction flow (>$10k)
No whale transactions >$10k detected recently for ANOME.
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
Anome presents a high-risk investment profile where tangible product delivery clashes with severe structural vulnerabilities. On the positive side, the project addresses specific market needs with its 'fund-locking' issuance mechanism to prevent rug pulls and has successfully launched its GameFi ecosystem with active partnerships. However, the investment case is heavily compromised by critical red flags. The tokenomics are deeply concerning, with only ~3% of the total supply in circulation, exposing investors to massive future dilution. Security remains a major point of contention; despite a CertiK audit, the protocol suffered a $120,000 exploit due to a valuation logic flaw, proving that audits have not guaranteed immunity from implementation errors. Furthermore, the project operates with low transparency—development is closed-source with no visible GitHub metrics, and the team remains largely undoxed while retaining centralized administrative control. While the 'anti-rug' narrative is compelling, the combination of a past hack, extreme vesting overhang, and centralized governance dictates extreme caution.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
