Anome
ANOME
Evaluation Score
Overall rating on a scale of 0-10
Dimension Breakdown
AI Analysis
Comprehensive evaluation of the token
ANOME (Anome) presents substantial structural risks across nearly all fundamental categories, resulting in an overall score of 2.3/10. A complete data gap was noted in Community Support (scored -1.0 due to search contamination with unrelated DAO projects), with its weight redistributed across the remaining sections. Development activity is unverified with zero public repositories, tagged releases, or governance executions. Tokenomics (1.5/10) exhibits critical opacity: total and maximum supply, token allocations, and vesting schedules are completely undisclosed, posing severe hyperinflationary risk. The protocol operates in an intensely competitive Web3 gaming sector with unverified adoption, an anonymous team, and an unexercised governance model. On the security front (4.5/10), Anome possesses a verified CertiK audit with 0 Critical or Major findings, though all 5 identified issues (including centralization risks) remain unaddressed/acknowledged, and third-party tools such as Kryll X-Ray flag high contract risk. While no qualifying catastrophic red-flag events (e.g. hacks, regulatory enforcement, or delistings) were affirmatively established, the pervasive lack of transparency and unverified mechanics make ANOME highly speculative and fragile.
Development Activity
Code updates and developer engagement
Community Support
Social media presence and community engagement
Tokenomics
Supply, distribution, and utility
Market & Use Case
Value proposition and competitive landscape
Team & Governance
Team background and project governance
Security & Audits
Security history and audit status
About Anome (ANOME)
ANOME (Anome) is a Web3 gaming and entertainment protocol operated by NOME Technology Sdn. Bhd., deployed on the BNB Smart Chain (BSC). The platform proposes an ecosystem architecture featuring gaming modules, match-based gaming rewards, a dual-token model, and a card-burn mechanism. Protocol governance is theoretically structured around an off-chain model utilizing Snapshot voting, although the governance mechanisms remain largely unexercised.
The project's underlying development and token distribution frameworks feature significant structural opacity. ANOME maintains an official documentation portal and roadmap, but it does not provide public source code repositories, tagged releases, or verifiable package-registry publications. Furthermore, while the reported circulating supply is approximately 1 billion tokens, the project has not publicly disclosed its total supply, maximum supply cap, token allocation breakdown, or vesting schedules, introducing potential inflation risks.
From a security perspective, ANOME underwent a third-party smart contract audit by CertiK covering 19 files. The audit identified no critical or major vulnerabilities, but logged five total findings—including centralization concerns and minor code volatility issues—all of which were acknowledged by the team rather than resolved. Additionally, automated risk monitoring services, such as Kryll X-Ray, have flagged the BSC contract with high-risk alerts. The team behind ANOME remains entirely anonymous. While the protocol has not experienced documented exploits, hacks, regulatory sanctions, or exchange delistings, the combination of undisclosed supply metrics, lack of public code, and centralized administrative controls constitutes the primary operational risk profile for the asset.